RE: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender

ietf-dkim

RE: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender

2007-12-04 16:00:16

It would be nice to have a clear guideline on what a mailing list
should do with a Sender, and/or a guideline that DKIM should not sign
the Sender field if message is intended for posting.


+1 on clear guidelines for discussion lists, but let's make that a new
BCP rather than trying to cram it into any of the currently open
documents.


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, John Levine Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, Frank Ellermann [ietf-dkim] Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity), John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, Dave Crocker RE: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, Bill.Oxley Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, Mark Martinec Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, Michael Thomas RE: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, J D Falk <= Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, Charles Lindsey Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, Mark Martinec

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Tracing SSP's paradigm change, Jim Fenton
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Tracing SSP's paradigm change, Dave Crocker
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, Michael Thomas
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender, Hector Santos
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]