Scott Kitterman wrote:
And that's also orthogonal to my point. That would be an argument against
SPF, but not SSP. If my mail is transparently forwarded (without
modification) then SSP presents no obstacle to store and forward. If someone
changes my message, then it's no longer my message. The fact that DKIM
signature break when messages are modified is a feature.
+1.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html