On Friday 07 December 2007 13:23, Steve Atkins wrote:
You'd need to be more specific. As you state it, my answer is that
you're clearly and obviously wrong.
If you were to be more specific in your wording (and the specificity
went
in the direction I'd expect) there's a chance I'd agree with you, but
at the
moment what you're saying is so broad and vague that it's clearly wrong.
Personally, I'd invest more time and effort in careful wording if I weren't
convinced this is all just playing gotcha and were in fact a serious
discussion.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html