Stephen Farrell wrote:
Aside from that, I tend not to aim to be argumentative & wish
more folks on this list had similar discipline. My thanks go
to those with a similar approach. (And yes, that is an indirect
rebuke specifically aimed at aspects of your otherwise overall
excellent contribution to DKIM, i.e a mixed message;-)
Stephen,
For a working group chair to post text like this that (only) targets a single
participant is unfortunate, first, given how freely ad hominems have been
flowing, yet you fail to focus on them too, and second because you offer a
generic rebuke without any supporting basis.
From a process management standpoint, your posting therefore appears to be
seeking to undermine my participation.
In what model of credible IETF working group management is that sort of
behavior by a chair acceptable.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html