ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1399: clarify i= vs. SSP

2007-12-09 09:50:09
Stephen,

Stephen Farrell wrote:
At the meeting last week we said we wanted to try get issue
1399 [1] resolved before Jim sends out a version of SSP to
start WGLC.

You are implying that you still think the document is quite close to working group last call. Is this correct?

Last Call is issued when there appears to be a stable consensus that the document is finished.

Is the intent, then, to ignore that fundamental issues that have been raised about its current form?

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html