On Monday 10 December 2007 11:46, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
I've got 33 messages from one participant in the last two days and I find
nothing novel or constructive in them in my personal opinion. Such
actions are (once again in my personal opinion which may well be wrong)
nothing more than a denial of service attack on this working group.
FWIW, I don't agree that this is just a DoS. At least some of the
issues raised haven't gotten much consideration over the last few
months and if we do want to produce a standards track SSP then we
need to do that level of review.
Sure. I have my opinion and you're certainly entitled to yours. As I've said
previously, I have neither the time nor the energy to sort through all the
chaff to see if or what bits of wheat are there.
To the extent I understand his flurry of comments I think they are largely
based on a lack of recollection of what the WG has been through already or a
fundamental misunderstanding of SSP. I don't think it's my job to fix either
of those.
Let's all stop speculating as to motives.
S.
Done. Good luck getting through this.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html