Jon Callas wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 9, 2007, at 11:26 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Dave Crocker wrote:
With the use of language like "suspicious", SSP is making value
judgement on messages that do not satisfy SSP's criteria, even
though those message well might be entirely legitimate.
Weasel words instead of "suspicious" would be an intentional lie.
The problem is the "even though", the "first author" concept is
utter dubious, unrelated to (2)822(upd), and claims that "first
author" is always the same as "originator" would be a perfidy.
How about something like "SSP Exception"? Metaphorically, it works
well with the programming use of the word exception.
I personally like
Negative and Positive Classification.
It some what fits the SMTP negative and positive response codes semantics.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html