Hopefully not adding to the noise, but I've seen about 5 people +1
my suggestion that t=testing should go.
Mike
Jon Callas wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 10, 2007, at 11:30 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Michael Thomas wrote:
Part of the problem is that "softfail" and "hardfail" don't make
much intuitive sense.
For SPF (and Sender ID) a SOFTFAIL is what SSP has as t-flag, and
an Authentication-Results: hardfail is just a FAIL (for SPF etc.).
For receivers accepting "hardfail", not exactly the ideal course,
but receivers are free to shoot into their own foot. Aim higher.
Well, FWIW, I don't think that t=testing is at all helpful either.
What,
for example, does p=strict, t=testing mean? It seems like a silly-
state
to me and ripe for confusion. It's that sort of subjective state
that we
should both learn from SPF and avoid.
+1
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html