Jon Callas wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
For receivers accepting "hardfail", not exactly the ideal course,
but receivers are free to shoot into their own foot. Aim higher.
Well, FWIW, I don't think that t=testing is at all helpful either.
What, for example, does p=strict, t=testing mean? It seems like
>> a silly- state to me and ripe for confusion. It's that sort
>> of subjective state that we should both learn from SPF and avoid.
+1
+1. Get rid of it.
For the record, I believe I raised this issue a few times over the past
few years, as I did with the SPF group. To accommodate those who might
want to keep it, I proposed that it be time limited consideration.
Since its only a concept that applies for "beta testing" or "migration",
that is has to be a time limited operation. So if anyone sees a test
site using DKIM, it should probably record this and track its usage.
Otherwise, IMO, +100, get rid of it.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html