Jim Fenton wrote:
Mark Delany wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
Is there a common subset of SSP that most everyone agrees on?
I thought we had documented it in RFC 5016.
From an IETF procedural perspective that may well be so - my question
is more about whether the sentiment of the WG matches 5016?
...
My sense from reading the list traffic is that there are a lot of
differing opinions on what the subset might contain, with results
ranging from making SSP vaguely useful to actively hostile to DKIM
deployment.
Jim,
I think you did not try to answer Mark's question. He didn't ask about the
range of individual opinions, which is the answer you gave. He asked about a
common subset that "most everyone agrees on". That permits leaving out stray,
outlier views. (And by the way, I don't recall seeing a recent posting
hostile to DKIM deployment.)
In other words, Jim, he asked a classic rough consensus question.
In fact my own reading of postings does show a rather solid common subset,
quite strongly. Just look for references to phrases like "not controversial".
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html