ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

[ietf-dkim] Process Question

2007-12-13 10:28:21
Dave Crocker wrote:
As for 5016, you are highlighting one of the problems with calling such documents "requirements" since slavish adherence to its desires eliminates any benefits from later insight.

What you call "slavish", I'd characterize as water under the bridge.
What you seem to be saying is that any single person should be able
to reopen with no barrier every bit of consensus that was achieved
in rfc5016. I'd like to hear what the actual barrier ought to be
from the chairs.

                Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html