RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02 DKIM=ALL a Flawed Concept

Hector wrote:

At least SSP-01 allows for the possible of 3rd party signatures. This
new version intentionally has no insight on 3PS.


Did you read why?


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP, Wietse Venema Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP, Hector Santos RE: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP, J D Falk Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP, Jon Callas [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02 DKIM=ALL a Flawed Concept, Hector Santos RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: SSP-02 DKIM=ALL a Flawed Concept, J D Falk <= Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP, Steve Atkins Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP, Hector Santos RE: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP, MH Michael Hammer (5304) Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] poison signatures, was draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02, John Levine RE: [ietf-dkim] The good, the bad and the ugly - was poison signatures, MH Michael Hammer (5304) forgeries (Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP), dhc Re: forgeries (Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-02.txt and ASP), Hector Santos