This is where we are at present on the NXDOMAIN issue I believe but
others might have a different view.
That's my impression, as well.
What's the path towards settling this?
I propose that the side advocating maintaining the NXDOMAIN check as an
actual algorithmic step agree to remove this from the algorithm
description in favor of placement somewhere else.
I propose that the side advocating removal of the NXDOMAIN check agree
to language which makes this step AT LEAST a SHOULD and preferably a MUST.
This is a completely reasonable and sensible way to close the issue IMO.
We are down to the bare-bones of what many of us are able to accept with
regard to further fundamental changes. Unbelievable compromise has
already been made and no side is getting all of what they want. We're
now talking about trimming ADSP to the point of near uselessness.
There's no more flesh we can carve from this pig and still make a sandwich.
Arvel
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html