On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:25 PM, J D Falk <jdfalk(_at_)returnpath(_dot_)net>
wrote:
Arvel explained:
> The debate has shifted from outright hostility to any NXDOMAIN check
> at all (complete elimination of it in it's
> entirely) to just removing it from a required algorithmic step and
> instead referencing it non-normatively with some version of "this is a
> good idea that you might want to think about if you're not already
> doing it."
>
> This is where we are at present on the NXDOMAIN issue I believe but
> others might have a different view.
That's my impression, as well.
What's the path towards settling this?
Vote? Survey?
Regards,
Al Iverson
--
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA
Remove "lists" from my email address to reach me faster and directly.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html