ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] forward movement, please? (was RE: Are lookalike domains like parent domains?)

2008-04-30 17:09:21
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:25 PM, J D Falk <jdfalk(_at_)returnpath(_dot_)net> 
wrote:
Arvel explained:

 > The debate has shifted from outright hostility to any NXDOMAIN check
 > at all (complete elimination of it in it's
 > entirely) to just removing it from a required algorithmic step and
 > instead referencing it non-normatively with some version of "this is a
 > good idea that you might want to think about if you're not already
 > doing it."
 >
 > This is where we are at present on the NXDOMAIN issue I believe but
 > others might have a different view.

 That's my impression, as well.

 What's the path towards settling this?

Vote? Survey?

Regards,
Al Iverson

-- 
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA
Remove "lists" from my email address to reach me faster and directly.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>