On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Douglas Otis wrote:
While such a scheme might be seen as Sender friendly if adopted,
this would doom DKIM. Selectors devoid of the publishing domain
offers no value. To suggest otherwise would be in support of a
false premise.
Indeed. But I haven't done that.
My apologies. The broken link to ARF limited better review. The ARF
draft has been updated since as well, where recollection of what was
included proved incorrect.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html