On 26/06/2008 10:53, "Dave Crocker" <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:
But the idea that anyone would think that a signing mechanism designed to
operate on RFC 2822 messages would somehow be expected to operate successfully
on non-conformant messages really bothers me.
And yet, those questions keep coming up -- even from people we'd expect to
understand what a correctly formed RFC 2822 message looks like.
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path
Work with me!
http://www.returnpath.net/careers/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html