On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:12:44 +0100, SM <sm(_at_)resistor(_dot_)net> wrote:
There is an implementation note about signing all end-user visible
header fields. The topic of multiple From headers came up during a
discussion about a DK implementation. It was suggested not to sign
such messages. If I recall correctly, the test was also done in the
DKIM implementation.
Yes, but scammers who sign their messages to enhance their plausibility
are now going to follow such "suggestions" nor to sign with such
implementations.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html