Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers

John Levine wrote:

it's not our problem.  Agreed?


+1   Maybe add a paragraph to the security considerations
     explaining that ADSP is about syntactically valid
     2822upd messages especially wrt From: header fields.

 Frank

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Frank Ellermann Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Charles Lindsey Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, SM Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, SM Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Charles Lindsey Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Frank Ellermann <= Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Jon Callas Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, J D Falk Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Roland Turner Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, J.D. Falk Re: [ietf-dkim] Not an issue: multiple From headers, Douglas Otis