ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-06 (fwd))

2008-09-21 20:05:07


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 6:49 PM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Version
Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-06 (fwd))

J D Falk:
On 20/09/2008 08:06, "Dave CROCKER" <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:



Stephen Farrell wrote:
It might be no harm if folks who do think ADSP should
go ahead would respond to this saying so.

+1

+1

+1.

+1


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>