since in its current very limited form I have no opinion on usefulness so
therefore no objection
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc
404-847-6397
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org on behalf of Dave CROCKER
Sent: Sat 9/20/2008 8:06 AM
To: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Version Notification
for draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-06 (fwd))
Stephen Farrell wrote:
It might be no harm if folks who do think ADSP should
go ahead would respond to this saying so.
+1
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html