On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:14 PM, MH Michael Hammer (5304)
<MHammer(_at_)ag(_dot_)com> wrote:
Actually, at the risk of sparking even greater flurries of electrons, it
is not sender created, it is signer created.
Makes sense.
Signer does not necessarily
have to equal sender for DKIM base. This is one of the reasons I tend to
fall into the "d=" camp.
I don't follow.
Al
--
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html