Re: [ietf-dkim] draft Errata on RFC 48712009-01-30 11:16:07On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 04:14:02PM -0500, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: Signer does not necessarily have to equal sender for DKIM base. This is one of the reasons I tend to fall into the "d=" camp. Don't forget i= is also in control of the signer too. An author/sender does not control it. -- Jeff Macdonald jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
|
|