On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Wietse Venema <wietse(_at_)porcupine(_dot_)org>
wrote:
Jim Fenton:
I'd like to see if there is consensus for my proposal to remove the term
before suggesting specific language.
I suggest: you propose a concrete replacement, and if it is better,
then we adopt it.
+1
I personally think "opaque" is an appropriate term. It's a pretty
common use of the term. However, I am likely going to be fine with
suggested replacement text.
Regards,
Al
--
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html