ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [ietf-dkim] Let's avoid "opaque"

2009-02-09 12:27:14
from [Suresh Ramasubramanian] [Permanent Link] 
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Jim Fenton <fenton(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:

def. 2a: Hard to understand or explain : UNINTELLIGIBLE
def. 2b: OBTUSE, STUPID

I didn't find your suggestion helpful, Suresh.


I am sure there are more appropriate synonyms to opaque available?
I'm not calling you stupid, and I am sure you realize that.

srs
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [ietf-dkim] Let's avoid "opaque", Dave CROCKER
Next by Date:  Re: [ietf-dkim] Let's avoid "opaque", Suresh Ramasubramanian
Previous by Thread:  Re: [ietf-dkim] Let's avoid "opaque", Jim Fenton
Next by Thread:  Re: [ietf-dkim] Let's avoid "opaque", Al Iverson
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]