ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Let's avoid "opaque"

2009-02-09 11:13:45
Wietse Venema wrote:

Jim Fenton:
I'd like to see if there is consensus for my proposal to remove the term
before suggesting specific language.

I suggest: you propose a concrete replacement, and if it is better,
then we adopt it.

If it helps, Jim, I'd support a better term -- if anyone can think of one. 
But the linguistic centers of my brain would rather be writing poetry, so 
anything I'm likely to come up with would be even /more/ opaque than "opaque."

(Fuliginous?  Turbid?  Otissian?)

-- 
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>