ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Let's avoid "opaque"

2009-02-10 10:56:44
+1 for opaque; the current usage is consistent with its widespread usage
in other contexts.

- Roland


On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 21:01 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Al Iverson 
<aiverson(_at_)spamresource(_dot_)com> wrote:
+1

I personally think "opaque" is an appropriate term. It's a pretty
common use of the term. However, I am likely going to be fine with
suggested replacement text.


+1 for opaque. People seeking alternatives are cordially requested to
consult a copy of Websters Thesaurus.

srs
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
-- 
  Roland Turner | Product Manager, RealMail | BoxSentry Pte Ltd
  3 Phillip Street, #13-03 Commerce Point, Singapore 048693
  Mob: +65 96700022 | Skype: roland.turner | Fax: +65 65365463
  roland(_dot_)turner(_at_)boxsentry(_dot_)com | www.boxsentry.com

    
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>