ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call

2009-03-09 16:10:34
MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:

So any use case that uses a list (private or public) of domains
to apply the algorithm to is probably out of scope for ADSP.

And this is the reason I like to say that ADSP is the public mechanism
for achieving what is currently being performed through private
agreements.

Right!  And private agreements can only scale so far.

The use case for ADSP "discardable" at a d= level is clear, and well 
understood.  Other possible ADSP uses are much more complex, which is (IIRC) 
why the WG consensus was to leave 'em out for now.  But, that out-of-scope 
complexity doesn't remove the need for the simple case.

-- 
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>