Then they should upgrade.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Atkins" <steve(_at_)wordtothewise(_dot_)com>
To: "ietf-dkim WG" <ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Tuesday, 10 March, 2009 7:41:18 AM (GMT+1200) Auto-Detected
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call
If ADSP assertions put constraints on DKIM use, especially
if those constraints end up affecting those who don't choose to
use ADSP, then it's a bit more important than that. (I'm already
seeing people who can't use DKIM appropriately because they're
using DKIM signing engines that were were written with one
limited use case in mind).
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html