Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental

2009-03-10 07:42:15

Please stop all this ADSP "good"/ADSP "bad" repetition.


I am specifically proposing that we withdraw it as
standards track and resubmit it as experimental,
because that's what it is.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, John Levine <= Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, MH Michael Hammer (5304) Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Byung-Hee HWANG Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Paul Russell

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Regarding Relaxed Canonicalization, John Levine
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Stephen Farrell
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Stephen Farrell
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Stephen Farrell
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]