You have suggested that many times. The WG and
the BoFs before it always disagreed. End of story
as far as I'm concerned unless *many* of those
that want it as standards-track now indicate
a change of mind.
Again, please stop. This is unproductive and
totally distracting the WG from progressing
with the 4871 errata,
Stephen.
John Levine wrote:
Please stop all this ADSP "good"/ADSP "bad" repetition.
I am specifically proposing that we withdraw it as
standards track and resubmit it as experimental,
because that's what it is.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html