On 3/23/09 1:49 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
The reason that l= was a bad idea is that it changes the answer to the
question of whether a message is signed from "yes" to "sort of". The
less sort-of, the better.
I'm sorry- in the plethora of email that is this list, I missed your
position on l=. I take it from your note that it should be required or
not at all?
Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html