ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus

2009-03-23 23:30:36

On Mar 23, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:

Steve Atkins wrote:
It's the existence of it that's a bad idea. The sole redeeming  
feature
is that it's optional, and so receivers can treat any signature  
with l=
as invalid, with no risk of affecting mail sent by competent senders.

Not according to the Crocker-Levine axis. All your decisions are
belong to them.

I don't get your point. Could you clarify?

Cheers,
   Steve

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>