ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting

2009-04-06 18:49:29
Dave CROCKER wrote:
Barry Leiba wrote:
  
    The new text has all been
agreed to on this list over the last week, in the three sub-threads
that Dave started... which is why we only need a brief check to make
sure they're OK.  We're not excluding anything.
    


Folks,

To emphasize:

    <http://dkim.org/ietf-dkim.htm#errata>

Includes a pointer to a diff file between the latest draft and the pre-vote draft.

The editing exercise was a matter of folding in the 3 circulated texts and, I 
believe, the correction Ellen offered.
  

Nits:

Sections 6 and 7:  s/semantics is/semantics are/

Section 12:  s/single, Signing Domain Identifier/single Signing Domain Identifier/

          s/DKIM's mandatory delivery/DKIM's mandatory output/
          s/semantics is/semantics are/

Otherwise looks fine.

What are we doing with the other errata in the queue?  Are they to be included in this update or processed as errata?

-Jim


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html