Original Text:
The tendency is to have the MUA highlight the address associated
with this signing identity in some way, in an attempt to show the user
the address from which the mail was sent.
Corrected Text:
The tendency is to have the MUA highlight the SDID, in an attempt
to show the user the identity that is claiming responsibility for the
message.
### Limiting annotations to just the SDID can result in the source of
the message being ambiguous which will negatively impact security!
Suggested correction:
The intent is to have the MUA highlight the SDID, and AUID that match
with email-addresses within signed header fields. The annotation
should help clarify for the user the SDID claiming responsibility for
the message, as well as possibly specific intra-SDID sources. AUIDs
that match with signed email-addresses can disambiguate messages
emanated by a mailing-list from those emanated directly by individual
users, for example.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html