Doug Otis <doug(_dot_)mtview(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> writes:
On Apr 10, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Folks,
Barry Leiba wrote:
As chair, I note that any attempt to use the "errata" format of the
update document to *remove* text will be fraught. The text will
still exist (and will, in fact, be repeated in this document).
As a participant, my inclination would be to have the update
replace the whole Appendix D like this:
...
But I could also accept leaving Appendix D as it is for now, and
dealing with it in the 4871bis effort.
I'd like to strongly encourage the working group to defer this
change until the -bis work.
Agreed.
Agreed, too.
We should settle DKIM-Base in stable as soon as possible.
--
Byung-Hee HWANG, KNU
∑ WWW: http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html