I am not ready to make that statement yet. Considering that a lot of spam has
valid DKIM signatures I am not sure when I will make that statement
________________________________
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Franck Martin
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 6:23 PM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: [ietf-dkim] DKIM adoption
Looking at DKIM adoption. I have seen statements that some mailers will do DKIM
based reputation if available, but I have yet to see a statement as either:
-an email not signed with DKIM will have its reputation lowered (less likely to
pass filters)
-an email signed with DKIM will have its reputation increased (more likely to
pass filters)
I think if there were some postmasters making such statement it would boost the
adoption of DKIM.
I think stating that some postmasters are moving to domain based reputation is
just encouraging the status quo of not DKIM signing to stay in IP based
reputation.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html