Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com wrote:
, but I have yet to see a statement
as either:
-an email not signed with DKIM will have its reputation lowered (less
likely to pass filters)
-an email signed with DKIM will have its reputation increased (more
likely to pass filters)
The presence or absence of a DKIM signature carries no inherent semantics about
reputation of the signer.
Consequently anyone increasing or lowering a reputation assessment based on the
presence or absence of a DKIM signature is going far beyond its stated purpose.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html