On 25/Jan/10 20:48, John R. Levine wrote:
suppose that Yahoo! Inc goes out of business and the domain keys patent is
acquired by Unisys...
Then it makes no difference at all, since the existing license is
perpetual and sublicensable.
But that's bound by, and subject to, the Specifications unspecified by
a broken link.
Really, this is not a productive line of argument.
Sadly agreed. Non-productivity stems from using patent encumbered
ideas and suspecting that DKIM, much like a pigeon, can be shoot down
as soon as it flies. Isn't there anything that the IETF can do, in
connection with rechartering, to get out of the impasse?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html