On 03/11/2010 10:50 AM, Pasi(_dot_)Eronen(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com wrote:
Just two unprocessed errata left! Tackling the easier one first:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=1532
Appendix A of draft-ietf-dkim-deployment has detailed text about
this topic (differences in DNS key records between DomainKeys and DKIM),
so I'm not sure if RFC 4871 really needs this information.
How about rejecting this errata (with a pointer to Appendix A
of draft-ietf-dkim-deployment in the Notes field)?
Works for me. Absent objections in the next week, let's
go for that.
Stephen.
Best regards,
Pasi
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html