Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM errata 1532 (v= and DomainKeys)

Pasi(_dot_)Eronen(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com wrote:
> Jim Fenton wrote:
>
> Hmm -- back in IETF73 we seemed to agree (at least according to the
> email below) that guessing is, while probably not a good idea,
> possibly less bad than the alternative:
>
> http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2008q4/010820.html
>   
Hmm, that's right; I had forgotten completely about that.  However, 
errata 1532 still shows up as "reported"; that means it still needs to 
be acted on, right?  I'm still not entirely clear on the process for errata.

-Jim

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html