Barry,
The discussion has raised the issue of working with IDNs and EAI. Do
we have consensus add a charter item for that? Is it necessary that
we do? If we want one, someone please propose charter text and one or
more milestones for it.
6. Review proposed by EAI changes and make needed accommodations where
appropriate. This effort might include strategies for handling domains
with overlapping puny-code versions of an initial UTF-8 U-label... Feb
2012. (IDNA will take time, where DKIM WG involvement should improve
the results.)
Resultant domains representing common administrations needed to handle
rule changes in puny-code conversions. This will impact email
significantly. ADSP might assist in determining whether puny-code
referenced signatures relate to the resulting multitude of visual email
addresses. While many consider DKIM limited to white-listing, ADSP in
conjunction with some consolidation mechanism could assist in managing
new TLDs and many related domains.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html