Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter

2010-03-15 21:14:57

Would an appropriate part of this output be a "standard" test suite
for implementations to try, i.e. a batch of test messages and their
expected body and header hashes?


Yes, definitely.  There are plenty of RFCs that include test vectors
to validate implementations, e.g. RFCs 2144, 2410, 3711, and 4434.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] IDNs, was Proposed new charter, (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] IDNs, was Proposed new charter, John R. Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] IDNs, was Proposed new charter, Charles Lindsey Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter, Barry Leiba Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter, Barry Leiba Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter, John Levine <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter, Murray S. Kucherawy
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM errata 1532 (v= and DomainKeys), Pasi(_dot_)Eronen(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter, Murray S. Kucherawy
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Broken signature analysis, Dave CROCKER
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]