This looks good. Ok to become a WG document
Pity we may need a separate document for "forwarding" or can this notion be
included in the current document?
Also can parts be more normative than informational? ie what a MLM MUST do when
supporting DKIM.
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk(_at_)cloudmark(_dot_)com>
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Sent: Monday, 10 May, 2010 11:01:54 AM
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available
I’ve posted an individual submission draft that attempts to capture some of the
consensus and some appropriate guidance around the use of DKIM in the context
of mailing lists. I don’t propose that it’s final at all, but merely an anchor
point for further discussion.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-dkim-lists/
Would the WG like to bring it in and make it a WG document? If so, I volunteer
to act as editor.
-MSK
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html