ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-levine-dbr-00 (fwd)

2010-07-29 11:00:56


--On 26 July 2010 18:24:34 +0200 "J.D. Falk" 
<jdfalk-lists(_at_)cybernothing(_dot_)org> wrote:


I think it's because, when you implement most protocols, if your end is
broken then you can't even talk to the other end.  With ADSP, if your end
is broken then you can still talk SMTP and even sign with DKIM, but the
other end may silently discard your message.  There's no feedback.


About 90% of the email sent to my personal email address ends up in a Gmail 
junk mail folder, that I never check. There's no feedback there, either.

-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html