ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarifying DKIM (etc.) expectations for mailing lists in the face of digests

2010-08-04 16:49:10
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 2:10 PM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarifying DKIM (etc.) expectations for
mailing lists in the face of digests

    A mailing list digest does not preserve DKIM signatures from (any
of) the
original messages, and this appears to be acceptable to the community.

Does "acceptable" here mean the community has considered the issue and elected 
to accept it the way it is, or the community is unaware of this as a 
consideration and operates calmly unaware of it as a possibility?


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>