ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Feedback on draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists for discussion

2010-08-10 12:42:54


"Dave CROCKER" <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:



On 8/2/2010 11:34 AM, Steve Atkins wrote:
A "-1" on ever altering the From: field for any reason other than special
requirements of the people running a specific mailing list.


A +1 in support of that -1.

The view that modifying the From: is helpful has no empirical basis.  I'll 
claim 
that there is a pretty good theoretical basis for believing it makes things 
worse, not better.

As always, the instant the IETF gets into user interface design, it steps out 
of 
its group competence.  As a group, we do not have the training in cognitive 
models, UXE, or the rest of what's needed to work in this space.

That seems pretty orthogonal to the discussion so far.  Declaring discussion of 
From off limits because it is also displayed makes me wonder why you thought it 
was alright for the IETF to take on the work codified in RFC 822 and its 
descendants? 

Just because it's displayed doesn't mean any change is driven by UX 
considerations.  I get that you're intent on avoiding anything that might make 
ADSP deployment less difficult, but please stick to the arguments that make 
some sense. 

Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html