On Aug 1, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Daniel Black
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 4:48 PM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Feedback on draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists for
discussion
b) Would it be a good idea to suggest MLM implementers make signing
of
submissions into a user-configurable option?
Which signing are you talking about?
The MLM Output.
What would the benefit to the recipient of the mail not being
signed by the MLM be?
Cheers,
Steve
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html