Some offlist feedback I wanted to bounce to the list to gauge consensus:
a) Section 5.1 currently advocates a warning to new subscribers to an MLM with
a highly restrictive ADSP policy. Should this be stronger, such as "a warning
is advised, and full denial should be considered"?
b) Would it be a good idea to suggest MLM implementers make signing of
submissions into a user-configurable option? I think there was some text in
there already about the idea of bifurcating the list's output into a signed
stream and an unsigned stream, but since I'm getting the opposite suggestion
now it probably means the draft doesn't indicate in enough detail why this
might be a bad (or good) idea. Can anyone provide some additional commentary?
c) A "-1" to the idea of altering From: to cope with ADSP; the reason given:
"This presumes endpoints will understand a DKIM-related From:-altered message."
-MSK
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html