Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review

> What ADSP users want is irrelevant. This is about what MLMs want (which is
> most likely to ensure that submitted messages reach the whole of their
> list without problems).
Right.  The easiest way to do so, assuming you believe that enough people 
will use ADSP to matter, is to discard incoming messages with ADSP 
settings that can cause trouble.  If they say their mail is discardable, 
take them at their word and discard it.
> Clearly, mailing lists that do things to the From: SHOULD (even MUST)
> sign, and any RFC documenting my proposal would include that.
Hmmn.  Since you apparently believe this is a valuable and useful 
proposal, could you remind us why, exactly, you're not writing it?
Writing I-Ds isn't hard.  Lots of us do it all the time.

R's,
John

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html