ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review

2010-09-03 14:11:59
On 03/Sep/10 16:15, Hector Santos wrote:
Alessandro Vesely wrote:

Crypto stuff at connection time is a different ongoing task, which
may be useful in countering replay attacks in general. Joint
signatures and From-%-rewriting are two easier and more specific
techniques for describing how responsibility is transferred when a
message transforms into another. I mentioned them in this thread
because I deem they are worth being considered, each in its niche of
suitable use cases.

[Importance of From] said, I believe what you speaking of is when a mail bot
completely take over a message from an authorized or intentional
design basis. i.e. a newsletter, a newspaper article, a read only
forum, whatever, etc, messaging usages were the From: is less
important and more of a "global entity."

Yes, I'm speaking of cases where the From is being rewritten already. 
  Frankly, I don't like that the value of "From" be changed.  However, 
in the regrettable case it is changed, it doesn't hurt if it is 
rewritten in a standardized way.

And how about joint signatures?

Let me ask you this, does this apply to a MLM serving a LIST such as
this one? IETF-DKIM? Should it be programmed to change it to?

Please refer to Charles' original proposal for details
http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2010q3/013807.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>